The Bulkhead pattern is a type of application design that is tolerant of failure. In a bulkhead architecture, elements of an application are isolated into pools so that if one fails, the others will continue to function. It’s named after the sectioned partitions (bulkheads) of a ship’s hull. If the hull of a ship is
In Microservice Architecture, where the Microservices communicates Synchronously, a Microservice usually calls other services to fulfill business requirements. Call to another service can fail due to transient faults (slow network connection, timeouts, or temporal unavailability). In such cases, retrying calls can solve fix the issue. However, if there is a severe issue (complete failure of
If we want to use Microservice Architecture in a brownfield project, we need to migrate legacy or existing Monolithic applications to Microservices. Moving an existing, large, in-production Monolithic applications to Microservices is quite challenging as it may disrupt the application’s availability. One solution is to use the Strangler pattern. Strangler pattern means incrementally migrating a
In Microservice Architecture, the UI usually connects with multiple Microservices. If the Microservices are finely grained (FaaS), the Client may need to connect with lots of Microservices, which becomes chatty and challenging. Also, the services, including their APIs, can evolve. Large enterprises will like to have other cross-cutting concerns (SSL termination, authentication, authorization, throttling, logging,
If you use Microservice Architecture with Database per Microservice, then managing consistency via distributed transactions is challenging. You cannot use the traditional Two-phase commit protocol as it either does not scale (SQL Databases) or is not supported (many NoSQL Databases). You can use the Saga pattern for distributed transactions in Microservice Architecture. Saga is an old pattern developed